Page 1 of 1

Because of the “opposite”

Posted: Thu Feb 13, 2025 8:42 am
by kexej28769@nongnue
Okay, it took me a while to get over it. In the middle of this graph, I fixed a major mistake where I was only looking at domains for the root domain on Ahrefs, instead of the root domain and all subdomains. This was unfair to Ahrefs until I fixed everything in February. Since then, Moz has been aggressively growing its index, Majestic has picked up LRD counts through the network discussed earlier but has plateaued, and Ahrefs has remained relatively stable in size. nature of these metrics, it would be misleading to assume that Ahrefs is falling dramatically. They are not. They are still huge, and just as impressive. The actual path is directional: Moz is growing dramatically relative to their networks. As of this writing, Moz is winning.


Behavior
Being the “first to know” is a key part of almost any bahrain number data industry and it’s no different with link index. You want to know as soon as possible when a link goes up or down and how good that link is so you can respond when needed. Here’s our current velocity metric.


فاسٹ کرول
What is the probability that the latest post will be indexed from a randomly selected set of RSS feeds?


Unlike the other metrics discussed, the sampling process here is a little different. Instead of using the randomization above, we randomly select from a million+ well-known RSS feeds to find their latest post and check to see if they are included in Moz and various competitor indexes. While there are some inaccuracies in this graph, I think there is only one clear path. Ahrefs is right about its crawlers. They are fast and they are everywhere. While Moz has dramatically and rapidly increased our coverage, it has barely made a dent in this FastCrawl metric.