Page 1 of 1

A conversation with lawyers who work in the family area

Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2025 4:36 am
by mahbubamim077
It doesn't take much effort to reflect on the same issue in the context of emotional relationships: marriage and stable unions. Would there really be a family environment if we applied the same pseudo duty to distrust? What kind of couple is this? What kind of family is this? It seems obvious to us that such a scenario attacks the family in its very nature. There are no shark families; mating between these animals is done through aggression (the male bites the female to hold her, covers her and leaves); baby sharks do not grow up with their mother and there are records of siblings devouring each other.

This is the analogical expression of the duty to distrust. Preferring pop culture, remember myanmar bulk sms packages that, in the 1980s, the English band Culture Club became successful singing this paradox: “ Everyday is like survival/You're my lover not my rival”; “Karma Chameleon” was composed by George O'Dowd, Jon Moss, Mikey Craig, Phil Pickett, Roy Hay and was on the album Colour by Numbers (Virgin Records, 1983). Finally, staying on legal grounds, let us invoke the head of article 226 of the Constitution of the Republic: The family, the basis of society, has special protection from the State. Mistrust as a rule would not be compatible with such a provision.

Spouses and cohabitants have a family duty of good faith, which includes not only the duty of good governance of the common property – in cases where there is a common property, but translates into a right to trust, which is the opposite of the duty of fiduciary, of fidelity (which cannot be limited to sex and affection). Being thus obliged, they are also required to provide true and complete information.