Strangely enough, you disqualify yourself just by thinking about asking such questions. of journalists to ask critical questions. But here they are clearly losing interest. You don't win the people's sympathy if you confront Greta harshly. It's better to just let her talk. It's a bit reminiscent of the children's performances on "Das Supertalent". The actual performance is secondary, it's just kind of yucky.
If Greta - a hypothetical example - were to saudi arabia rcs data campaign against development aid, journalists would now examine in detail how she got on this wrong path. What went wrong in her parents' home, who influenced her, who advises her, who writes her speeches? But this is about climate protection. And you don't ask questions about a topic like this. Someone who wants to save the world evades research.
Of course, the blame does not lie solely with the media. When the WEF organizers jump on the trend and invite the young Swede, they give her weight and justify all the lines that are written afterwards. But what is written ? That Greta sleeps in the tent. How she keeps warm there. How long her journey by train was. What she did during the journey. Investigative journalism at its finest.
When it comes to the Swede, every newspaper, no matter how serious, suddenly becomes a light-hearted rag. No one asks whether she has controversially dealt with the demands she is now making of the world. No one confronts her with counter-theses. No one challenges her. Because of course you can't do that with a teenager who wants to secure the future for all of us. Instead, we sit there and watch her reading from a sheet of paper in the live stream.
Greta Thunberg is the perfect example of how the media, in a spirit of premature obedience, neglects its task as soon as it senses that it will otherwise encounter resentment from the audience.