This is what is written in the preamble of the French Constitutio

[mahbubamim077]

Another question that occurs to me is this: is the benefit guaranteed only to industrial or commercial workers, or also to agricultural or rural workers? It seems to me that the constitutional text, which refers to workers and companies , does not allow any exclusion. If one were to establish such an exclusion, I believe it would be disastrous, since it would grant urban workers yet another advantage that stimulates the rural exodus, aggravating this problem that calls for urgent and effective measures.

The share is in profits and not in losses. The worker does not acquire buy bulk sms pakistan the status of partner, with all the risks, but that of quasi-partner, who has the advantages but not the burdens – which justifies special precautions to ensure the integrity of the capital, in order to allow the company the means to recover any losses it may eventually incur.

Participation is direct and mandatory. It is a constitutional determination. In my opinion, with due respect to divergent opinions, direct participation in profits means participation in money, in the same type and conditions (although not in the same proportion) in which the profit is received by the company's partners. The objective of the constitutional mandate is really to associate the worker directly with the company's benefits. And if profits are distributed by fiscal year, and in money, employers and workers must participate in them, in the same way, in the proportion established by law.